Home | Site Map | Cisco How ToNet How To | Windows Vista | Case Studies | Forums | Services | Donations | Careers | About Us | Contact Us|

 

Server setup Collections 0703

Re: How to set NIC to be default

Re: how to change volume cluster size in Windows Server 2003

Re: Help and Support Missing

Re: Getting started with WDS

Re: force product key prompt?

Re: File System / Directory Security

Re: failed admin pak installation - w2k3

Re: Enterprise Edition Licensing

Re: DHCP Server - Unable to change the Netmask

Re: DDE problem with W2K3

RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Re: Configure for Exchange 2007

Re: Client hangs on Applying computer settings message

Re: Client does not boot from WDS (please wait message)

Re: can Event Viewer send an email if specific events happen?

Re: Boot.ini and RAM configuration.

Re: After setup, server cannot access network

Re: adprep R2 / SBS->x64

Re: Ad help desk delegation

Re: ?? Server 2003 R2 Crashes on Setup ??

Re: 3 GB  Memeory

Re: 2003 server replication

Re: 2003 SBS Cals

RE: 2.7TB RAID Volume can only use 2.1TB

 

From: Cris Hanna [SBS-MVP] <crisnnospamhanna@computingnospampossibilities.net>

To: none

Subject: Re: How to set NIC to be default

Date: 09/18/2007 17:22:16

 

 

 

Think you're probably in the wrong Newsgroup for this one

"Miha" <miha.bernik@email.si> wrote in message news:uQQgTDk%23HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

Hi

 

 

 

Have a problem with setting one of two Ethernet adapters to default.

 

Win2003 Web Server, 2 NICs are connected to a switch which has two firewalls

connected to it.

 

 

 

1 NIC 190.191.0.18/16 GW 190.191.2.1

 

2 NIC 190.191.0.17/16 GW 190.191.0.1

 

 

 

First NIC routes through a firewall that has access to the internet, second

NIC routers through a firewall that has access to LAN and Internet.

 

But after restarting server, or disabling/enabling second NIC, default

traffic is always routed through second NIC through GW 190.191.0.1, but I

want that internet traffic is always routed through the first NIC that has

GW 190.191.2.1?

 

So in other words I want to achieve that first NIC will be default adapter.

 

How can this be done?

 

Thank you in advance

 

 

 

Regards,Miha

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Bill Grant <not.available@online>

To: none

Subject: Re: How to set NIC to be default

Date: 09/18/2007 18:22:32

 

 

You should not have two NICs enabled which are in the same IP subnet,

unless they are teamed. You can only have one gateway per machine, not one

per interface.

 

"Miha" wrote in message

news:uQQgTDk%23HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Hi

>

>

>

> Have a problem with setting one of two Ethernet adapters to default.

>

> Win2003 Web Server, 2 NICs are connected to a switch which has two

> firewalls connected to it.

>

>

>

> 1 NIC 190.191.0.18/16 GW 190.191.2.1

>

> 2 NIC 190.191.0.17/16 GW 190.191.0.1

>

>

>

> First NIC routes through a firewall that has access to the internet,

> second NIC routers through a firewall that has access to LAN and Internet.

>

> But after restarting server, or disabling/enabling second NIC, default

> traffic is always routed through second NIC through GW 190.191.0.1, but I

> want that internet traffic is always routed through the first NIC that has

> GW 190.191.2.1?

>

> So in other words I want to achieve that first NIC will be default

> adapter.

>

> How can this be done?

>

> Thank you in advance

>

>

>

> Regards,Miha

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Miha <miha.bernik@email.si>

To: none

Subject: Re: How to set NIC to be default

Date: 09/19/2007 10:40:15

 

 

Yes that was the problem. I deleted gw on the second nic and now it works

like we wanted.

Thanks!

Regards,

Miha

 

"Bill Grant" je napisal v sporočilo

news:uAYBErk%23HHA.5360@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl ...

> You should not have two NICs enabled which are in the same IP subnet,

> unless they are teamed. You can only have one gateway per machine, not one

> per interface.

>

> "Miha" wrote in message

> news:uQQgTDk%23HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

>> Hi

>>

>>

>>

>> Have a problem with setting one of two Ethernet adapters to default.

>>

>> Win2003 Web Server, 2 NICs are connected to a switch which has two

>> firewalls connected to it.

>>

>>

>>

>> 1 NIC 190.191.0.18/16 GW 190.191.2.1

>>

>> 2 NIC 190.191.0.17/16 GW 190.191.0.1

>>

>>

>>

>> First NIC routes through a firewall that has access to the internet,

>> second NIC routers through a firewall that has access to LAN and

>> Internet.

>>

>> But after restarting server, or disabling/enabling second NIC, default

>> traffic is always routed through second NIC through GW 190.191.0.1, but I

>> want that internet traffic is always routed through the first NIC that

>> has GW 190.191.2.1?

>>

>> So in other words I want to achieve that first NIC will be default

>> adapter.

>>

>> How can this be done?

>>

>> Thank you in advance

>>

>>

>>

>> Regards,Miha

>>

>>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Claus <cjobes@nova-tech.org>

To: none

Subject: Re: How to set NIC to be default

Date: 09/18/2007 22:11:49

 

 

What is the purpose for this unsupported configuration? It doesn't make much

sense. And why are you using a class B network mask?

 

If you want it to work you need to create a routing table on your server and

tell it which addresses to use with which interface. In order to do that you

first need to define the traffic that you want to see over the 0.17

interface. What is the subnet range that you want to use via 0.17? After you

have done that, you send the rest through 0.18.

 

--

Claus

"Miha" wrote in message

news:uQQgTDk%23HHA.4880@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Hi

>

>

>

> Have a problem with setting one of two Ethernet adapters to default.

>

> Win2003 Web Server, 2 NICs are connected to a switch which has two

> firewalls connected to it.

>

>

>

> 1 NIC 190.191.0.18/16 GW 190.191.2.1

>

> 2 NIC 190.191.0.17/16 GW 190.191.0.1

>

>

>

> First NIC routes through a firewall that has access to the internet,

> second NIC routers through a firewall that has access to LAN and Internet.

>

> But after restarting server, or disabling/enabling second NIC, default

> traffic is always routed through second NIC through GW 190.191.0.1, but I

> want that internet traffic is always routed through the first NIC that has

> GW 190.191.2.1?

>

> So in other words I want to achieve that first NIC will be default

> adapter.

>

> How can this be done?

>

> Thank you in advance

>

>

>

> Regards,Miha

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Dave Patrick <DSPatrick@nospam.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: how to change volume cluster size in Windows Server 2003

Date: 08/29/2007 22:06:47

 

 

Yes, it should have been. From a command prompt;

 

chkdsk

 

to see the allocation unit size.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314878

 

 

--

 

Regards,

 

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.

Microsoft Certified Professional

Microsoft MVP [Windows]

http://www.microsoft.com/protect

 

"locoytravieso" wrote:

> Hello All-

>

> I am trying to install Office Groove Server and it's complaining that the

> cluster size is only 512 bytes. I formatted the C: partition at 20GB so it

> was my understanding this volume would already be at 4KB cluster sizes per

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/140365/en-us.

>

> Groove documentation states • Volume Cluster Size: 4KB (4096 bytes) for

> both

> the system volume and the data volume. under hardware requirements.

>

> http://technet2.microsoft.com/Office/en-us/library/14d1bd3b-917e-442a-bc9b-2e426a3d3d741033.mspx?mfr=true

>

> So how the bleep do I get the O/S to change the cluster size to 4KB?

>

> Thanks,

>

> locoytravieso

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Baboon <baboon@news.postalias>

To: none

Subject: Re: Help and Support Missing

Date: 08/21/2007 18:14:01

 

 

Yes, thanks. That worked perfectly on a 64 bit machine. I have others (x86

and x64), as this seems to be a problem that affects lots of 2003

installations.

 

Cheers.

 

"Meinolf Weber (Myweb)" wrote:

 

> Hello Charlie,

>

> Check out this article:

> http://blogs.technet.com/sbs/archive/2007/03/20/help-and-support-service-missing-after-installing-windows-2003-service-pack-2.aspx

>

> I used it and it works, but i am not sure about the 64bit version.

>

> Best regards

>

> Meinolf Weber (Myweb)

> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

> no rights.

>

> > Hi -

> >

> > Windows 2003 R2 x64, SP2 -

> > Help and Support Center is missing and this knowledge base article

> > acknowledges that it can be caused by the SP2 install:

> > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/937055/en-us

> > After changing to the proper directory, it says to run these 3

> > installer

> > commands:

> > . HelpSvc.exe /regserver /svchost netsvcs /RAInstall

> > . HSCUpd.exe -i hscmui.cab

> > . HSCUpd.exe -i hscsp_*3.cab

> > In the article it mentions that these cab files may not exist in every

> > language version. It appears that they do not exist in the 64 bit

> > English

> > version, because I get an error when I run the commands, and they

> > don't

> > appear on the 64 bit media like they do in the 32 bit media. Although

> > the

> > article says that it applies to the x64 version as well as x86, can

> > anyone

> > confirm that the article really is accurate when pertaining to x64. I

> > was

> > only able run the first command, and I have a feeling the other two

> > commands

> > need to be run on different cab files for x64.

> > Thanks.

> >

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: dawaves <dawaves@gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Getting started with WDS

Date: 09/13/2007 13:54:27

 

 

On Sep 12, 12:49 am, "NZSchoolTech" wrote:

> I have used RIS for a while, but WDS is another new learning curve. Let me

> see if my understanding makes some sense:

> 1. Sysprep the reference computer

> 2. Get a capture image from somewhere onto the WDS server (create it from a

> boot image)

> 3. PXE boot the reference computer and choose this image

> 4. It will boot this WinPE image and do the capture to create the Install

> image of that computer.

>

> Now if that is accurate, where do I get a capture image from?

>

> Our RIS server is WS2003 and it has been updated to SP2 which installs WDS,

> running in mixed mode. The reference computer is running Windows XP. WDS

> doesn't provide me with any WIM files for a capture image. Where do I get

> one from? I do have a Vista DVD but I don't know what it has on it.

>

> --

> --

> NZSchoolTech

 

Yes take the boot.wim from the vista CD and use it as a boot image wim

file. When you create your boot image, point it back to that boot.wim

file you saved on your server somewhere. Right Click on the newly

created boot image and choose "Create Capture Boot image". Follow the

wizard and name it appropriately. Now boot your target PC using PXE

and choose the newly created "Capture" boot image. Follow the wizard

and you should be good.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: arriste <arriste@gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Getting started with WDS

Date: 10/01/2007 15:12:19

 

 

On Sep 13, 11:54 am, dawaves wrote:

> On Sep 12, 12:49 am, "NZSchoolTech" wrote:

>

>

>

> > I have used RIS for a while, but WDS is another new learning curve. Let me

> > see if my understanding makes some sense:

> > 1. Sysprep the reference computer

> > 2. Get a capture image from somewhere onto the WDS server (create it from a

> > boot image)

> > 3. PXE boot the reference computer and choose this image

> > 4. It will boot this WinPE image and do the capture to create the Install

> > image of that computer.

>

> > Now if that is accurate, where do I get a capture image from?

>

> > Our RIS server is WS2003 and it has been updated to SP2 which installs WDS,

> > running in mixed mode. The reference computer is running Windows XP. WDS

> > doesn't provide me with any WIM files for a capture image. Where do I get

> > one from? I do have a Vista DVD but I don't know what it has on it.

>

> > --

> > --

> > NZSchoolTech

>

> Yes take the boot.wim from the vista CD and use it as a boot image wim

> file. When you create your boot image, point it back to that boot.wim

> file you saved on your server somewhere. Right Click on the newly

> created boot image and choose "Create Capture Boot image". Follow the

> wizard and name it appropriately. Now boot your target PC using PXE

> and choose the newly created "Capture" boot image. Follow the wizard

> and you should be good.

 

have you added the options into DHCP to make this work? I've followed

the steps as detailed but when I boot using PXE, it doesn't find the

server and boots into the sysprep'ed windows image. I haven't added

the options, but the PC and the WDS server are on the same network

segment, same layer 2 switch.

 

thanks,

 

Z

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Olaf Engelke [MVP Windows Server] <oenews01@mvps.org>

To: none

Subject: Re: force product key prompt?

Date: 09/19/2007 08:25:12

 

 

Hi Anthony,

"anthonyx26" wrote in message

news:FAEC23B2-B865-41DC-8FED-70AB4B4809C9@microsoft.com...

>I would like to distribute an image of a Windows Server 2003 installation

>(preinstalled with particular applications), but obviously I want it to

>remain a legal copy (I'm using VMWare). How can I force Windows to

>re-prompt for a new product key when it boots up? Or will such a tactic be

>pointless since the product key windows will be looking for will be

>specific to the windows version and/or cd I installed/from?

>

> Or would it be sufficient for the end user to simply have purchased their

> own retail copy of Windows 2003 (and have it sit on the

> shelf...effectively representing the legal ownership of the instance

> installed in the virtual machine)?

>

at least if it is not configured as Domain controller, sysprep is your

friend.

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=93F20BB1-97AA-4356-8B43-9584B7E72556?

Best greetings from Germany

Olaf

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Anteaus <Anteaus@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: File System / Directory Security

Date: 08/23/2007 16:48:03

 

 

Just thought I'd add that I've been down this road, and found one

insurmountable problem, namely that files moved between folders within the

same share don't acquire correct permissions for the folder they're in. Thus,

after a few things get shuffled around in the normal course of work, you have

a chaotic situation in which no-one can predict which files will be

accessible.

 

I don't know of any answer, other than to use share permissions instead,

which is what I normally do.

 

In Linux you can chmod 2770 (sticky group rights) to (largely) overcome this

problem, but I don't know of any Windows equivalent. Does anyone else?

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Roger Abell [MVP] <mvpNoSpam@asu.edu>

To: none

Subject: Re: File System / Directory Security

Date: 08/24/2007 02:29:03

 

 

In Windows most storage on people's own workstations is

fairly uniform in permissioning, at least the part where limited

users can save things, so this is not a big issue on workstations.

 

For server storage on Windows 2003 and earlier the intra-

partition move retaining explicit permissions is an issue as

you outline. There are a couple of approaches. When you

have two distinctly differently permissioned storage areas,

putting them on separate partitions is the main way to avoid

the problem. Another approach is to make it so that the user

modifiable storage areas have no explicit but only inherited

permissions, since the inherited permissions are always set

due to the location, before or after a move.

 

"Anteaus" wrote in message

news:A606E349-B9AA-4CEE-9D4A-7DC2270B452D@microsoft.com...

> Just thought I'd add that I've been down this road, and found one

> insurmountable problem, namely that files moved between folders within the

> same share don't acquire correct permissions for the folder they're in.

> Thus,

> after a few things get shuffled around in the normal course of work, you

> have

> a chaotic situation in which no-one can predict which files will be

> accessible.

>

> I don't know of any answer, other than to use share permissions instead,

> which is what I normally do.

>

> In Linux you can chmod 2770 (sticky group rights) to (largely) overcome

> this

> problem, but I don't know of any Windows equivalent. Does anyone else?

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: DaveH <DaveH.2xi57f@DoNotSpam.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: failed admin pak installation - w2k3

Date: 09/26/2007 00:15:07

 

 

I had a similar issue:

 

SMS was pushing out the adminpak but it failed on a few machines but

succeeded on others. I then tried installing manually via RDP and had

the same problem.

 

The installer needs to access files in the sp1 i386 directory. If you

use mstsc /console view you will see the popup asking for the windows

CD - whereas you wont see this via normal rdp session.

 

I then edited the registry to point to the correct location of the i386

directory (the original network location had changed) and it now works a

treat

 

reg keys:

 

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup

SourcePath

servicepacksourcepath

 

 

--

DaveH

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DaveH's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=31760

View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=495992

 

http://forums.techarena.in

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: kj [SBS MVP] <KevinJ.SBS@SPAMFREE.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Enterprise Edition Licensing

Date: 09/12/2007 15:42:44

 

 

dcamco wrote:

> I am trying to setup an x64 server that contains two Windows Server

> 2003 Standard x86 virtual machines.

>

> I know that Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition comes with

> licensing for up to 4 virtual machines.

>

> My question is this...

>

> If the host OS is Windows Server 2003 x64 Enterprise Edition, do I

> have licensing to install up to 4 x86 virtual machines?? Or does the

> licensing only apply to additional x64 installations?

>

>

> Any insight would be greatly appreciated.

 

Best to call MS licensing, but I believe you have "licenses" for up to 4

VM's of either kind. Since Virtual Server only supports x86 machines, then

you have no choice, unless you are running VMWare. In that case, you should

probably verify with MS Licensing ( I think you're covered ).

--

/kj

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: dcamco <dcamco.2wtgbf@DoNotSpam.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Enterprise Edition Licensing

Date: 09/12/2007 16:14:57

 

 

FYI-

 

From what my Dell rep has just told me "Yes your 4 VM’s you load using

the Licensing can run different x86 or x64 operating systems, for

instance if you needed one to run Exchange 07 which is x64 only."

 

 

--

dcamco

------------------------------------------------------------------------

dcamco's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=30225

View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=817070

 

http://forums.techarena.in

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: dcamco <dcamco.2wtj3g@DoNotSpam.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Enterprise Edition Licensing

Date: 09/12/2007 16:23:49

 

 

Thanks KJ,

 

From what I understand, Virtual Server will in fact support x64 VM's--

but only when they are on a x64 host.

 

 

--

dcamco

------------------------------------------------------------------------

dcamco's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/member.php?userid=30225

View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/showthread.php?t=817070

 

http://forums.techarena.in

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: kj [SBS MVP] <KevinJ.SBS@SPAMFREE.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Enterprise Edition Licensing

Date: 09/12/2007 17:28:50

 

 

dcamco wrote:

> Thanks KJ,

>

> From what I understand, Virtual Server will in fact support x64 VM's--

> but only when they are on a x64 host.

 

Wish it did, but it doesn't.

 

Q: Does Virtual Server 2005 support 64-bit processors?

A: Virtual Server 2005 R2 runs on both 32-bit and 64-bit (x64) host

operating systems. It supports both AMD64 and Intel IA-32e/EM64T (x64)

processors. Note that Virtual Server 2005 R2 does not support Itanium

(IA-64) processors. Earlier versions of Virtual Server run on x64-based

hardware provided it is running a 32-bit version of a supported host

operating system.

 

Note that Virtual Server 2005 R2 requires that guest operating systems be

32-bit.

 

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserversystem/virtualserver/evaluation/virtualizationfaq.mspx

 

 

--

/kj

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: kj [SBS MVP] <KevinJ.SBS@SPAMFREE.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: DHCP Server - Unable to change the Netmask

Date: 08/24/2007 15:37:27

 

 

Simon Begin wrote:

> We have a running DHCP server on 2003, and some 1000 users utilising

> it.

> Our network netmask change to add more IPs, but the scope and not all

> scopes and lots of IP reservations we have made.

>

> I'd like to change just the NETMASK on the DHCP scope, but it seems I

> have to delete ane recreate all the scope (It means 1 day of manual

> typing static IP adresses, not to mention typos)

>

> Anyone knows ?

>

> Thanks,

 

Export your reservations, then import back into your new scope(s)

 

http://blogs.msdn.com/anto_rocks/archive/2005/02/28/381539.aspx

 

--

/kj

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-kzhao@online.microsoft.com (Ken Zhao [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: Re: DHCP Server - Unable to change the Netmask

Date: 08/27/2007 01:03:34

 

 

Hello Simon,

 

Thank you for using newsgroup and thanks KJ for his great information

sharing.

 

Thanks ?

 

Ken Zhao

 

Microsoft Online Support

Microsoft Global Technical Support Center

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security /www.microsoft.com/security>

====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

 

 

--------------------

| From: "kj [SBS MVP]"

| References:

| Subject: Re: DHCP Server - Unable to change the Netmask

| Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 13:37:27 -0700

| Lines: 22

| X-Priority: 3

| X-MSMail-Priority: Normal

| X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138

| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138

| X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response

| Message-ID:

| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.setup

| NNTP-Posting-Host: ip68-2-173-167.ph.ph.cox.net 68.2.173.167

| Path: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl

| Xref: TK2MSFTNGHUB02.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.setup:2457

| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.setup

|

| Simon Begin wrote:

| > We have a running DHCP server on 2003, and some 1000 users utilising

| > it.

| > Our network netmask change to add more IPs, but the scope and not all

| > scopes and lots of IP reservations we have made.

| >

| > I'd like to change just the NETMASK on the DHCP scope, but it seems I

| > have to delete ane recreate all the scope (It means 1 day of manual

| > typing static IP adresses, not to mention typos)

| >

| > Anyone knows ?

| >

| > Thanks,

|

| Export your reservations, then import back into your new scope(s)

|

| http://blogs.msdn.com/anto_rocks/archive/2005/02/28/381539.aspx

|

| --

| /kj

|

|

|

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Simon Begin <hugorobichrg@news.postalias>

To: none

Subject: Re: DHCP Server - Unable to change the Netmask

Date: 08/27/2007 07:51:05

 

 

Thanks very much, It works well!

 

 

"kj [SBS MVP]" a écrit dans le message de

news: u$fvW6o5HHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

> Simon Begin wrote:

>> We have a running DHCP server on 2003, and some 1000 users utilising

>> it.

>> Our network netmask change to add more IPs, but the scope and not all

>> scopes and lots of IP reservations we have made.

>>

>> I'd like to change just the NETMASK on the DHCP scope, but it seems I

>> have to delete ane recreate all the scope (It means 1 day of manual

>> typing static IP adresses, not to mention typos)

>>

>> Anyone knows ?

>>

>> Thanks,

>

> Export your reservations, then import back into your new scope(s)

>

> http://blogs.msdn.com/anto_rocks/archive/2005/02/28/381539.aspx

>

> --

> /kj

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Dave Patrick <DSPatrick@nospam.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: DDE problem with W2K3

Date: 08/23/2007 21:56:14

 

 

This article may help.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/203980

 

--

 

Regards,

 

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.

Microsoft Certified Professional

Microsoft MVP [Windows]

http://www.microsoft.com/protect

 

wrote:

> Hi,

>

> I have two vb applications that uses the old DDE technology on

> Windows

> Server 2000. I must promote to Windows Server 2003. I have the same

> configurations that the WS2000 (Network DDE services etc.)

>

>

> I have this error when the applications try to connect (by DDE

> technology):

> Run-time Error '282':

> No foreign application responded to a DDE initiate

>

>

> I try to start three services (Network DDE, Network DDE DSDM and

> ClipBook).

> I try to stop services and set Startup type to Manual.

> I try change the link topic properties (corresponding with this

> article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/203980/en-us )

>

>

> I have always the error message.

>

>

> Does DDE protocol is supported with W2K3 ?

>

>

> I know that this technology is bad, very bad, but I have no choice to

> keep this technology.

>

>

> Do you have a solution ?

>

>

> Thanks

>

>

> Sly

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/21/2007 05:29:26

 

 

Hello,

 

Yes you can. You can always use RIS images when WDS server is set to mixed

mode.

 

You can find more server functionality modes information in the following

article:

Windows Deployment Services Update Step-by-Step Guide for Windows Server

2003

http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9e197135-6711-4c20-bfa

d-fc80fc2151301033.mspx?mfr=true

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/21/2007 05:48:00

 

 

Thank you. It appears that you cannot directly convert flat images to WIM,

correct?

 

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hello,

>

> Yes you can. You can always use RIS images when WDS server is set to mixed

> mode.

>

> You can find more server functionality modes information in the following

> article:

> Windows Deployment Services Update Step-by-Step Guide for Windows Server

> 2003

> http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9e197135-6711-4c20-bfa

> d-fc80fc2151301033.mspx?mfr=true

>

> I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> unclear, please feel free to let us know.

>

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/22/2007 04:38:01

 

 

I tried doing a conversion using wdsutil. I got the following error:

--------------------

Error Code 0xC103012A

Fix-ups necessary for conversion could not be applied. The short name for a

file specified in the file's $SYSPREPSFN stream could not be applied because

the name was already assigned to another file in the same folder

--------------------

The folder that I was trying to create the wim file in is currently empty.

I have not been able to find any more information on how to resolve this

error.

Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

 

"Mike_g" wrote:

 

> Thank you. It appears that you cannot directly convert flat images to WIM,

> correct?

>

> "Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

>

> > Hello,

> >

> > Yes you can. You can always use RIS images when WDS server is set to mixed

> > mode.

> >

> > You can find more server functionality modes information in the following

> > article:

> > Windows Deployment Services Update Step-by-Step Guide for Windows Server

> > 2003

> > http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9e197135-6711-4c20-bfa

> > d-fc80fc2151301033.mspx?mfr=true

> >

> > I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> > unclear, please feel free to let us know.

> >

> > Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> > Microsoft Online Partner Support

> >

> > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> > =====================================================

> > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> > =====================================================

> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

> >

> >

> >

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/22/2007 06:16:02

 

 

I tried using a different ripreped image and got a different error:

...

...

... Inserting required drivers into image

Error Code: 0x80360051

 

 

"Mike_g" wrote:

 

> I tried doing a conversion using wdsutil. I got the following error:

> --------------------

> Error Code 0xC103012A

> Fix-ups necessary for conversion could not be applied. The short name for a

> file specified in the file's $SYSPREPSFN stream could not be applied because

> the name was already assigned to another file in the same folder

> --------------------

> The folder that I was trying to create the wim file in is currently empty.

> I have not been able to find any more information on how to resolve this

> error.

> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.

>

> "Mike_g" wrote:

>

> > Thank you. It appears that you cannot directly convert flat images to WIM,

> > correct?

> >

> > "Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

> >

> > > Hello,

> > >

> > > Yes you can. You can always use RIS images when WDS server is set to mixed

> > > mode.

> > >

> > > You can find more server functionality modes information in the following

> > > article:

> > > Windows Deployment Services Update Step-by-Step Guide for Windows Server

> > > 2003

> > > http://technet2.microsoft.com/WindowsVista/en/library/9e197135-6711-4c20-bfa

> > > d-fc80fc2151301033.mspx?mfr=true

> > >

> > > I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> > > unclear, please feel free to let us know.

> > >

> > > Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> > > Microsoft Online Partner Support

> > >

> > > Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> > > =====================================================

> > > When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> > > that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> > > =====================================================

> > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

> > >

> > >

> > >

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/22/2007 07:31:58

 

 

Hello Mike,

 

I didn't find any similar problems. Can you try to convert an image file

with short name (which is in 8.3 format)? And, do you have the same problem

when convert images in MMC console?

 

Please le me know the detailed switches you used to convert image.

 

The chapter 7 of the following document discussed two methods to convert

image:

Deploying and Managing the Windows Deployment Services Update on Windows

Server 2003

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941D4393-AB37-4047-

B9C5-616B79D73301?

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/22/2007 10:58:05

 

 

Sean,

Are you referring to the sif file? Current name is riprep.sif.

As to using the console, I have not tried it, but I see other comments on

the net that have the same problems using the command line as the console.

- Mike

 

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hello Mike,

>

> I didn't find any similar problems. Can you try to convert an image file

> with short name (which is in 8.3 format)? And, do you have the same problem

> when convert images in MMC console?

>

> Please le me know the detailed switches you used to convert image.

>

> The chapter 7 of the following document discussed two methods to convert

> image:

> Deploying and Managing the Windows Deployment Services Update on Windows

> Server 2003

> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941D4393-AB37-4047-

> B9C5-616B79D73301?

>

> I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> unclear, please feel free to let us know.

>

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/22/2007 12:12:04

 

 

Here is are the commands and output from the two runs:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case 1:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D:\SCOC_Configs>wdsutil /verbose /progress /Convert-RiPrepImage

/FilePath:"E:\RemoteInstall\Setup\En

_RIPREP\i386\Templates\riprep_PE2950.sif" /DestinationImage

/FilePath:"E:\Working\PE2950.wim" /NAme:

0" /Description:"Converted Image of Ripreped 2950 - Bad PERCSAS.sys"

/OVerwrite:Append

 

Windows Deployment Services Management Utility [Version 6.0.6000.16386]

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

 

-> Copying temporary files to folder "e:\temp\~$WDSMGMT.000"

 

..................................................

 

-> Preparing image for capture

 

..................................................

 

 

An error occurred while trying to execute the command.

Error Code: 0xC103012A

Error Description: Fix-ups necessary for conversion could not be applied.

The short name for a file

e's $SYSPREPSFN stream could not be applied because the name was already

assigned to another file in

 

 

D:\SCOC_Configs>pause

Press any key to continue . . .

 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Case 2:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D:\SCOC_Configs>set TEMP=e:\temp

 

D:\SCOC_Configs>set TMP=e:\temp

 

D:\SCOC_Configs>wdsutil /verbose /progress /Convert-RiPrepImage

/FilePath:"E:\RemoteInstall\Setup\En

003SP2Mar2007\i386\Templates\riprep.sif" /DestinationImage

/FilePath:"E:\Working\S2003SP2.wim" /NAme

scription:"Converted Image of Server 2003 SP2 Mar 2007" /OVerwrite:Append

 

Windows Deployment Services Management Utility [Version 6.0.6000.16386]

Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

 

-> Copying temporary files to folder "e:\temp\~$WDSMGMT.000"

 

..................................................

 

-> Preparing image for capture

 

..................................................

 

-> Inserting required drivers into image

 

 

An error occurred while trying to execute the command.

Error Code: 0x80360051

Error Description:

 

D:\SCOC_Configs>pause

Press any key to continue . . .

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

 

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hello Mike,

>

> I didn't find any similar problems. Can you try to convert an image file

> with short name (which is in 8.3 format)? And, do you have the same problem

> when convert images in MMC console?

>

> Please le me know the detailed switches you used to convert image.

>

> The chapter 7 of the following document discussed two methods to convert

> image:

> Deploying and Managing the Windows Deployment Services Update on Windows

> Server 2003

> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=941D4393-AB37-4047-

> B9C5-616B79D73301?

>

> I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> unclear, please feel free to let us know.

>

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/23/2007 05:34:32

 

 

Hello Mike,

 

I couldn't find an error code list for wdsutil. And the list I have can't

explain the problem you have described. Regarding your post, you had two

different error code when converting two different images, I suggest we

re-initialize WDS and test again. If the problem persists, uninstall WDS

and re-install it on a clean server is recommended.

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/27/2007 05:38:29

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

How's everything going?

 

I have not heard back from you in a few days and wanted to check on the

status of the problem. I look forward to future updates.

 

Best Regards,

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/27/2007 06:16:04

 

 

Sean,

We are off every other Friday, which is why I did not respond.

Installing on another server is not really feasible. What would I have to do

to reinitialize WDS? I would not want to break my exisiting RIS installations

images

- Mike

 

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hi Mike,

>

> How's everything going?

>

> I have not heard back from you in a few days and wanted to check on the

> status of the problem. I look forward to future updates.

>

> Best Regards,

>

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/28/2007 06:47:02

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

WDS reinitialize will remove all current settings but won't effect any

images. I said to install WDS on another server is mainly for test purpose,

I don't mean to use it as a resolution. I'm sorry I didn't clarify myself.

 

I'm creating a test environment to re-produce your problem. You will be

informed right after I have a result.

 

Best Regards,

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/28/2007 06:56:01

 

 

Thank you, Sean.

To reinitialize is this correct?

1. At the command prompt, type wdsutil /uninitialize-server, and then press

ENTER.

2. wdsutil /initialize-server /reminst:{RemoteInstallFolder}

- Mike

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hi Mike,

>

> WDS reinitialize will remove all current settings but won't effect any

> images. I said to install WDS on another server is mainly for test purpose,

> I don't mean to use it as a resolution. I'm sorry I didn't clarify myself.

>

> I'm creating a test environment to re-produce your problem. You will be

> informed right after I have a result.

>

> Best Regards,

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/29/2007 09:21:24

 

 

Hello Mike,

 

The process to reinitialize WDS is correct.

 

I consulted WDS team colleagues for error code 0xC103012A. It seems the

conversion routine returns this if it finds several files in the same

folder that have conflicting short names (stored in their alternate

streams) and is thus unable to apply the short names to these files. My

guest on such situation are accidently reserved office temporary files.

 

The time to build a test environment is more than I expected, I'll let you

know the result when I have one.

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mike_g <mike_g@nospam.nospam>

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/29/2007 10:12:04

 

 

Thank you Sean.

That at least gives me something to look for. I don't suppose that there is

any debug flag that could be set to let me know what directory and/or files

are the problems, is there?

- Mike

 

"Sean Cai [MSFT]" wrote:

 

> Hello Mike,

>

> The process to reinitialize WDS is correct.

>

> I consulted WDS team colleagues for error code 0xC103012A. It seems the

> conversion routine returns this if it finds several files in the same

> folder that have conflicting short names (stored in their alternate

> streams) and is thus unable to apply the short names to these files. My

> guest on such situation are accidently reserved office temporary files.

>

> The time to build a test environment is more than I expected, I'll let you

> know the result when I have one.

>

> I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

> unclear, please feel free to let us know.

>

> Sean Cai, MCSE2000

> Microsoft Online Partner Support

>

> Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

> =====================================================

> When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

> that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

> =====================================================

> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 08/30/2007 06:59:23

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

WDSutil hasn't a switch to do that. You can use Process monitor to see when

wdstuil fails, however since RIS image contains hundreds of files, wdsutil

may generate a very long log. Therefore, I suggest you to enable Process

monitor a few time before the error will appear.

 

You can get Process Monitor in the following link:

Process Monitor v1.22

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysinternals/utilities/processmonitor.mspx

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 09/05/2007 04:31:34

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

I need a few more days to finish my test (I encountered anther problem in

the past few days), I'll inform you my result in two days. Sorry for the

inconvenience.

 

Best Regards,

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 09/10/2007 06:00:27

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

I couldn't reproduce the problem you have. A few long name files were

created manually, but the convert finished successfully.

 

If you have captured a log file by process monitor, please send it to

me:v-secai@microsoft.com. I'll check it to see what causes the problem.

 

I hope the information above can address your concerns. If anything is

unclear, please feel free to let us know.

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: v-secai@online.microsoft.com (Sean Cai [MSFT])

To: none

Subject: RE: Converting RIS Images to WIM Format

Date: 09/13/2007 06:06:29

 

 

Hi Mike,

 

How's everything going?

 

I have not heard back from you in a few days. If you have any updated

information on the problem, please let me know.

 

Best Regards,

 

Sean Cai, MCSE2000

Microsoft Online Partner Support

 

Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security

=====================================================

When responding to posts, please "Reply to Group" via your newsreader so

that others may learn and benefit from your issue.

=====================================================

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] <lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Configure for Exchange 2007

Date: 09/07/2007 08:17:04

 

 

Outlook Integrator wrote:

> I am about to deploy Exchange 2007 and would like to know if anyone

> has a list of things that

>

> 1. Need to be installed - IIS for example

> 2. Nice to haves - Utilities etc.

> 3. Could also be run on the server - SQL Server 2005?

> 4. Don't Do IT Evers - Like Domain Controller

>

> In addition, if someone has an unattended install script I would

> really appreciate seeing it.

>

> Thanks in Advance

 

I suggest you post in microsoft.public.exchange.admin for the most expert

help with this.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Dave Patrick <DSPatrick@nospam.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Client hangs on Applying computer settings message

Date: 08/31/2007 21:56:01

 

 

Your DNS setting are incorrect. This article may help.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/260362

 

--

 

Regards,

 

Dave Patrick ....Please no email replies - reply in newsgroup.

Microsoft Certified Professional

Microsoft MVP [Windows]

http://www.microsoft.com/protect

 

"Rusty" wrote:

>I had a small workgroup. I needed Exchange so I Installed Windows server

> 2003 R2 and then Exchange 2003. The install went fine. I then logged on

> to

> a client machine and had it join the domain. The dialogue asked for an

> account with permissions to join so I gave it the domain administrator

> account and I got the welcome to the domain dialogue box. I rebooted and

> tried to log on as the Domain administrator so I could give install

> permissions to the user that would be using the machine. On boot, the

> machine hung at "Loading your personal settings". Actually I had mouse

> movement so it wasn't completely hung. I then tried the same thing on

> another machine with the same result. I tried again on each machine and

> now

> it boots quickly through the "Loading your Personal settings" message and

> hangs at "Applying computer settings". Again, I have mouse movement but

> no

> boot.

>

> Please advise,

>

> Thanks

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Daveg <dguenthners@yahoo.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Client does not boot from WDS (please wait message)

Date: 09/08/2007 07:17:14

 

 

What may be going on is that the boot.wim has the correct PXE

compliant NIC drivers for the workstation but not for the server. I

would go to HP's website or NIC vendor and download "RIS" complient

drivers. Then inject those into the boot.wim. See what happens.

 

daveg

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: stuartpwells@gmail.com

To: none

Subject: Re: can Event Viewer send an email if specific events happen?

Date: 09/05/2007 13:53:18

 

 

On Sep 5, 2:17 pm, wrote:

> I'd like to send out an email if an event occures, say like a failed login.

>

> Any ideas would be appreciated!

>

> Thanks

>

> Kelvin

 

event viewer out of the box will not do this. You need a utility for

this and there are a few out there. For security events check out GFI

SELM. Free trial

 

www.gfi.com

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: net_admin <netadmin@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: RE: can Event Viewer send an email if specific events happen?

Date: 09/05/2007 14:18:04

 

 

Unfortunately no! I hope 2008 does that.

 

One can use MOM or ActivExperts Network Monitor for that.

There are others, but I don't remember by heart.

 

--

NetAdmin

"Das ist nicht mein bier... arschloch."

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: R. Paulson <RPaulson@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: RE: can Event Viewer send an email if specific events happen?

Date: 09/05/2007 15:30:00

 

 

You can have Exchange program certain events to email you, but if you run

Small Businiess Server yes, you can program it to send you Event viewer

Alerts plus threshholds...

 

"Kelvin Beaton" wrote:

 

> I'd like to send out an email if an event occures, say like a failed login.

>

> Any ideas would be appreciated!

>

> Thanks

>

> Kelvin

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: t <t@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: RE: can Event Viewer send an email if specific events happen?

Date: 09/05/2007 17:06:03

 

 

 

 

"Kelvin Beaton" wrote:

 

> I'd like to send out an email if an event occures, say like a failed login.

>

> Any ideas would be appreciated!

>

> Thanks

>

> Kelvin

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mathieu CHATEAU <gollum123@free.fr>

To: none

Subject: Re: Boot.ini and RAM configuration.

Date: 08/30/2007 17:26:12

 

 

To use the 3G, application must have a flag in their image (.exe) header.

Else it's useless. But it raise down the system to 1G, and that my hurt

hard.

 

RAM > 4G use /PAE or ram is useless

 

For using memory upper than 4G, the PAE is mandatory. To use it, application

still need to go throught the AWE API.

 

 

--

Cordialement,

Mathieu CHATEAU

http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

 

 

"Dragon" wrote in message

news:%23TYEJI16HHA.4736@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

> Hi,

>

> I have heard a few contradictory information regarding which switches to

> use for different RAM config. So far I have the following list.

>

> RAM > RAM >= 8GB and > RAM >= 16GB Use /PAE

>

> All these systems use 32bit OS. The only application running is either SQL

> 2000 or SQL 2005.

>

> Thank you.

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Mathieu CHATEAU <gollum123@free.fr>

To: none

Subject: Re: Boot.ini and RAM configuration.

Date: 08/30/2007 17:30:53

 

 

may hurt...

 

time to bed!

 

--

Cordialement,

Mathieu CHATEAU

http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

 

 

"Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote in message

news:uUU7GT16HHA.3740@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> To use the 3G, application must have a flag in their image (.exe) header.

> Else it's useless. But it raise down the system to 1G, and that my hurt

> hard.

>

> RAM > 4G use /PAE or ram is useless

>

> For using memory upper than 4G, the PAE is mandatory. To use it,

> application still need to go throught the AWE API.

>

>

> --

> Cordialement,

> Mathieu CHATEAU

> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com

>

>

> "Dragon" wrote in message

> news:%23TYEJI16HHA.4736@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

>> Hi,

>>

>> I have heard a few contradictory information regarding which switches to

>> use for different RAM config. So far I have the following list.

>>

>> RAM >> RAM >= 8GB and >> RAM >= 16GB Use /PAE

>>

>> All these systems use 32bit OS. The only application running is either

>> SQL 2000 or SQL 2005.

>>

>> Thank you.

>>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Meinolf Weber <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>

To: none

Subject: Re: After setup, server cannot access network

Date: 09/18/2007 15:19:34

 

 

Hello Pop,

 

Please post an ipconfig /all from the dns server and the new one. If you

do niot use both NIC's with teaming disable the not used.NIC.

 

Best regards

 

Meinolf Weber

Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

no rights.

 

> We have a Windows 2003 Standard R2 SP2 server just added to the

> network. I have DNS, DHCP and AD running correct as far as I can tell.

> All of this is running on a Dell PowerEdge 2800. I had help setting up

> DNS and DHCP so I know those should be good. Though since the server

> has 2 NIC cards, it is all pointing to one of the cards. When plugging

> in the network cable to that card. Nothing happens - no internet, no

> network, no nothing. When plugging the cable into the second card it

> pulls the IP address from the NT4 DHCP service on the network, but

> looks at 127.0.0.1 for DNS.

>

> I am not sure where I went wrong, networking is a new skill set.

>

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Pop Tart <PopTart@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: After setup, server cannot access network

Date: 09/18/2007 16:00:02

 

 

Meinolf,

 

Thanks for the reply! I had called another more experienced network person

and found out what the issue was. We disabled DHCP for now. Currently the NT4

box is running DHCP and has a reservation for an IP with x.x.10.x, where as

before, the server was running with a statically assigned x.x.0.x. After

setting the new server to the reservation that was present and setting the

default gateway. I am back on the network. It seems that the server was setup

for a x.x.0.x network and everything I needed was on the x.x.10.x network.

 

Thanks!!

 

"Meinolf Weber" wrote:

 

> Hello Pop,

>

> Please post an ipconfig /all from the dns server and the new one. If you

> do niot use both NIC's with teaming disable the not used.NIC.

>

> Best regards

>

> Meinolf Weber

> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

> no rights.

>

> > We have a Windows 2003 Standard R2 SP2 server just added to the

> > network. I have DNS, DHCP and AD running correct as far as I can tell.

> > All of this is running on a Dell PowerEdge 2800. I had help setting up

> > DNS and DHCP so I know those should be good. Though since the server

> > has 2 NIC cards, it is all pointing to one of the cards. When plugging

> > in the network cable to that card. Nothing happens - no internet, no

> > network, no nothing. When plugging the cable into the second card it

> > pulls the IP address from the NT4 DHCP service on the network, but

> > looks at 127.0.0.1 for DNS.

> >

> > I am not sure where I went wrong, networking is a new skill set.

> >

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Meinolf Weber <meiweb(nospam)@gmx.de>

To: none

Subject: Re: After setup, server cannot access network

Date: 09/18/2007 16:06:26

 

 

Hello Pop,

 

Just one remark, for servers switches routers work with fixed ip's not with

reservations from DHCP. Better start scopes from x.x.x.10 or 20 and hold

the beginning ip's for your own needs.

 

Best regards

 

Meinolf Weber

Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

no rights.

 

> Meinolf,

>

> Thanks for the reply! I had called another more experienced network

> person and found out what the issue was. We disabled DHCP for now.

> Currently the NT4 box is running DHCP and has a reservation for an IP

> with x.x.10.x, where as before, the server was running with a

> statically assigned x.x.0.x. After setting the new server to the

> reservation that was present and setting the default gateway. I am

> back on the network. It seems that the server was setup for a x.x.0.x

> network and everything I needed was on the x.x.10.x network.

>

> Thanks!!

>

> "Meinolf Weber" wrote:

>

>> Hello Pop,

>>

>> Please post an ipconfig /all from the dns server and the new one. If

>> you do niot use both NIC's with teaming disable the not used.NIC.

>>

>> Best regards

>>

>> Meinolf Weber

>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and

>> confers

>> no rights.

>>> We have a Windows 2003 Standard R2 SP2 server just added to the

>>> network. I have DNS, DHCP and AD running correct as far as I can

>>> tell. All of this is running on a Dell PowerEdge 2800. I had help

>>> setting up DNS and DHCP so I know those should be good. Though since

>>> the server has 2 NIC cards, it is all pointing to one of the cards.

>>> When plugging in the network cable to that card. Nothing happens -

>>> no internet, no network, no nothing. When plugging the cable into

>>> the second card it pulls the IP address from the NT4 DHCP service on

>>> the network, but looks at 127.0.0.1 for DNS.

>>>

>>> I am not sure where I went wrong, networking is a new skill set.

>>>

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Matt Dwyer <mdwyer@dwyer.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: adprep R2 / SBS->x64

Date: 08/21/2007 14:26:04

 

 

Ok, I figured out the adprep, now, another question... once I finish setting

up the new domain controller, can I turn off the old one, and then change

the ip of the new DC to be the same as the old DC? I assume so, as long as

I am consistent on the new DC (e.g, point at itself for dns, etc).

 

I know the old ip is set on at least a dozen machines, including some

routers, and it would be lovely if I didn't have to go reprogram all those

guys with a new ip.

 

 

"Danny Sanders" wrote in message

news:OPIRYa43HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> 1) Do I need to run adprep for R2 extensions simultaneously in both

>> branch and main offices?

>

> You need to run adprep on the existing schema master for your existing

> domain, using an account that is a member of the schema admin group. That

> schema update will replicate to the other DCs in the domain.

>

>> 2) Considering that the new domain computer is Std R2 x64, and old one is

>> SBS x32, will the adprep on that disk run in my old domain controller

>> (um, maybe a PIII processor or something)? Yeah, I can try it, I was

>> just hoping for knowledge prior to experimentation.

>

> I think you are going to have problems here. You may need adprep from a 32

> bit version. I have not done this but I think I remember reading about

> others in the same situation.

>

>

>> 3) Do I need to/should I buy a copy of Win2K3 R2 to run at the branch

>> domain controller (x32 Xeon), or can I just adprep the branch for r2?

>

> R2 is a two disk set. The first CD is Win 2k3 with SP 1, the second disk

> is the new R2 features. You would run adprep from the second disk of the

> R2 set to prepare the domain for the new R2 features. You actually install

> the new R2 features by running setup2 from the second disk on the actual

> servers you want the new R2 features on. If you are using R2 for the new

> DFSR features in a domain with 4 servers and 2 of those four servers you

> want to replicate with each other. You run adprep from the second disk of

> the R2 set on the schema master for the domain, now your domain is ready

> to support servers installed with the new R2 features. You want to use the

> NEW DFSR features on two *other* Win 2k3 servers so they can replicate

> files between each other, you would just run setup2 from the second disk

> of the R2 set to install those updated features.

>

>

>> 4) With only 30 users, I could also create the new domain controller from

>> scratch. My experience with other Windows desktops leads to think there

>> might be advantages to starting from scratch (applicable to server

>> world?). I would need to add in some GPO settings: remote access, google

>> desktop, a couple others, but I don't think there are a lot of

>> settings....and I may have old settings that are incorrect nowadays.

>> Any comments on that approach?

>

> You would end up having to add the existing user computers to the new

> domain and they will receive a new profile. All their desktop settings

> will change. In my experience, users freak out when their profile changes.

> This route will add more time because you may have to go to each desktop

> and all the user access to their old profile.

>

>> 5) If I did install the domain controller from scratch, would my separate

>> exchange server trash all my users' email accounts (ie., start over)?

>> That would be exceptionally bad. Or do I just export and import users

>> from sbs to new DC?

>>

>

>

> See:

> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/812453/en-us

>

> hth

> DDS

>

>

> "Matt Dwyer" wrote in message

> news:OKnWoI43HHA.5844@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>I have a W2K3 SBS domain controller with a separate W2K3 Std Exchange 2003

>>Enterprise member server (which also runs Terminal server) and a separate

>>Win2K3 Std Sql 2000 member server, and a wan with a W2K3 SBS additional

>>domain controller at a branch site. Not many users (about 25 in main, 5

>>in remote site).

>>

>> I want to replace the SBS DC with a new 2003 x64 Std server. Right now,

>> the SBS also serves up our Sharepoint Team Services website, and runs

>> WSUS 3.0.

>>

>> Ok, I found an article with instructions on replacing SBS to 2003 Std:

>> http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Migrating-Small-Business-Server-2003-Exchange-Standard-Part1.html

>> (or http://tinyurl.com/ybxme8 ). The exchange part does not apply to me,

>> since I already have a separate 2003EE server. The process fails when I

>> try to run dcpromo, however, with the error message:

>>

>> The operation failed because: The Active Directory Installation Wizard

>> cannot continue because the forest is not prepared for installing Windows

>> Server 2003. Use the adprep command-line tool to prepare both the forest

>> and the domain.... "The version of the Active Directory schema of the

>> source forest is not compatible with the version of Active Directory on

>> this computer."

>>

>> I see here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917385 that I need to install

>> R2 extensions by using the cdrom that came with my new computer on my old

>> domain controller. At that point, I stopped, as I was really hoping not

>> to touch old domain controller till the new one was cooking.

>>

>> Questions:

>>

>> 1) Do I need to run adprep for R2 extensions simultaneously in both

>> branch and main offices?

>>

>> 2) Considering that the new domain computer is Std R2 x64, and old one is

>> SBS x32, will the adprep on that disk run in my old domain controller

>> (um, maybe a PIII processor or something)? Yeah, I can try it, I was

>> just hoping for knowledge prior to experimentation.

>>

>> 3) Do I need to/should I buy a copy of Win2K3 R2 to run at the branch

>> domain controller (x32 Xeon), or can I just adprep the branch for r2?

>>

>> 4) With only 30 users, I could also create the new domain controller from

>> scratch. My experience with other Windows desktops leads to think there

>> might be advantages to starting from scratch (applicable to server

>> world?). I would need to add in some GPO settings: remote access, google

>> desktop, a couple others, but I don't think there are a lot of

>> settings....and I may have old settings that are incorrect nowadays.

>> Any comments on that approach?

>>

>> 5) If I did install the domain controller from scratch, would my separate

>> exchange server trash all my users' email accounts (ie., start over)?

>> That would be exceptionally bad. Or do I just export and import users

>> from sbs to new DC?

>>

>> As usual.. thanks in advance...

>> Matt

>>

>>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Danny Sanders <DSanders@NOSPAMciber.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: adprep R2 / SBS->x64

Date: 08/21/2007 16:41:37

 

 

> up the new domain controller, can I turn off the old one, and then change

> the ip of the new DC to be the same as the old DC? I assume so, as long

> as I am consistent on the new DC (e.g, point at itself for dns, etc).

 

Make sure the new server is a Global catalog and has the FSMO roles along

with DNS and you should be good to go.

 

 

hth

DDS

 

 

"Matt Dwyer" wrote in message

news:eUoyUkC5HHA.3716@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...

> Ok, I figured out the adprep, now, another question... once I finish

> setting up the new domain controller, can I turn off the old one, and then

> change the ip of the new DC to be the same as the old DC? I assume so, as

> long as I am consistent on the new DC (e.g, point at itself for dns, etc).

>

> I know the old ip is set on at least a dozen machines, including some

> routers, and it would be lovely if I didn't have to go reprogram all those

> guys with a new ip.

>

>

> "Danny Sanders" wrote in message

> news:OPIRYa43HHA.3900@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>> 1) Do I need to run adprep for R2 extensions simultaneously in both

>>> branch and main offices?

>>

>> You need to run adprep on the existing schema master for your existing

>> domain, using an account that is a member of the schema admin group. That

>> schema update will replicate to the other DCs in the domain.

>>

>>> 2) Considering that the new domain computer is Std R2 x64, and old one

>>> is SBS x32, will the adprep on that disk run in my old domain controller

>>> (um, maybe a PIII processor or something)? Yeah, I can try it, I was

>>> just hoping for knowledge prior to experimentation.

>>

>> I think you are going to have problems here. You may need adprep from a

>> 32 bit version. I have not done this but I think I remember reading about

>> others in the same situation.

>>

>>

>>> 3) Do I need to/should I buy a copy of Win2K3 R2 to run at the branch

>>> domain controller (x32 Xeon), or can I just adprep the branch for r2?

>>

>> R2 is a two disk set. The first CD is Win 2k3 with SP 1, the second disk

>> is the new R2 features. You would run adprep from the second disk of the

>> R2 set to prepare the domain for the new R2 features. You actually

>> install the new R2 features by running setup2 from the second disk on the

>> actual servers you want the new R2 features on. If you are using R2 for

>> the new DFSR features in a domain with 4 servers and 2 of those four

>> servers you want to replicate with each other. You run adprep from the

>> second disk of the R2 set on the schema master for the domain, now your

>> domain is ready to support servers installed with the new R2 features.

>> You want to use the NEW DFSR features on two *other* Win 2k3 servers so

>> they can replicate files between each other, you would just run setup2

>> from the second disk of the R2 set to install those updated features.

>>

>>

>>> 4) With only 30 users, I could also create the new domain controller

>>> from scratch. My experience with other Windows desktops leads to think

>>> there might be advantages to starting from scratch (applicable to server

>>> world?). I would need to add in some GPO settings: remote access, google

>>> desktop, a couple others, but I don't think there are a lot of

>>> settings....and I may have old settings that are incorrect nowadays. Any

>>> comments on that approach?

>>

>> You would end up having to add the existing user computers to the new

>> domain and they will receive a new profile. All their desktop settings

>> will change. In my experience, users freak out when their profile

>> changes. This route will add more time because you may have to go to each

>> desktop and all the user access to their old profile.

>>

>>> 5) If I did install the domain controller from scratch, would my

>>> separate exchange server trash all my users' email accounts (ie., start

>>> over)? That would be exceptionally bad. Or do I just export and import

>>> users from sbs to new DC?

>>>

>>

>>

>> See:

>> http://support.microsoft.com/kb/812453/en-us

>>

>> hth

>> DDS

>>

>>

>> "Matt Dwyer" wrote in message

>> news:OKnWoI43HHA.5844@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>>>I have a W2K3 SBS domain controller with a separate W2K3 Std Exchange

>>>2003 Enterprise member server (which also runs Terminal server) and a

>>>separate Win2K3 Std Sql 2000 member server, and a wan with a W2K3 SBS

>>>additional domain controller at a branch site. Not many users (about 25

>>>in main, 5 in remote site).

>>>

>>> I want to replace the SBS DC with a new 2003 x64 Std server. Right now,

>>> the SBS also serves up our Sharepoint Team Services website, and runs

>>> WSUS 3.0.

>>>

>>> Ok, I found an article with instructions on replacing SBS to 2003 Std:

>>> http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Migrating-Small-Business-Server-2003-Exchange-Standard-Part1.html

>>> (or http://tinyurl.com/ybxme8 ). The exchange part does not apply to

>>> me, since I already have a separate 2003EE server. The process fails

>>> when I try to run dcpromo, however, with the error message:

>>>

>>> The operation failed because: The Active Directory Installation Wizard

>>> cannot continue because the forest is not prepared for installing

>>> Windows Server 2003. Use the adprep command-line tool to prepare both

>>> the forest and the domain.... "The version of the Active Directory

>>> schema of the source forest is not compatible with the version of Active

>>> Directory on this computer."

>>>

>>> I see here: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/917385 that I need to

>>> install R2 extensions by using the cdrom that came with my new computer

>>> on my old domain controller. At that point, I stopped, as I was really

>>> hoping not to touch old domain controller till the new one was cooking.

>>>

>>> Questions:

>>>

>>> 1) Do I need to run adprep for R2 extensions simultaneously in both

>>> branch and main offices?

>>>

>>> 2) Considering that the new domain computer is Std R2 x64, and old one

>>> is SBS x32, will the adprep on that disk run in my old domain controller

>>> (um, maybe a PIII processor or something)? Yeah, I can try it, I was

>>> just hoping for knowledge prior to experimentation.

>>>

>>> 3) Do I need to/should I buy a copy of Win2K3 R2 to run at the branch

>>> domain controller (x32 Xeon), or can I just adprep the branch for r2?

>>>

>>> 4) With only 30 users, I could also create the new domain controller

>>> from scratch. My experience with other Windows desktops leads to think

>>> there might be advantages to starting from scratch (applicable to server

>>> world?). I would need to add in some GPO settings: remote access, google

>>> desktop, a couple others, but I don't think there are a lot of

>>> settings....and I may have old settings that are incorrect nowadays. Any

>>> comments on that approach?

>>>

>>> 5) If I did install the domain controller from scratch, would my

>>> separate exchange server trash all my users' email accounts (ie., start

>>> over)? That would be exceptionally bad. Or do I just export and import

>>> users from sbs to new DC?

>>>

>>> As usual.. thanks in advance...

>>> Matt

>>>

>>>

>>

>>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Meinolf Weber (Myweb) <meiweb@gmx.de>

To: none

Subject: Re: Ad help desk delegation

Date: 08/22/2007 10:44:31

 

 

Hello Dwonder,

 

Which tasks should they run? Would be easier to help you if we know that.

 

Best regards

 

Meinolf Weber (Myweb)

Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

no rights.

 

> Good morning,

>

> Any one have any ideas on the best practice to delegate control to the

> help desk with out given complete admin access. Any Help would be

> great.

>

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Dwonder <Dwonderful@gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Ad help desk delegation

Date: 08/22/2007 12:22:07

 

 

On Aug 22, 11:44 am, Meinolf Weber (Myweb) wrote:

> Hello Dwonder,

>

> Which tasks should they run? Would be easier to help you if we know that.

>

> Best regards

>

> Meinolf Weber (Myweb)

> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers

> no rights.

>

> > Good morning,

>

> > Any one have any ideas on the best practice to delegate control to the

> > help desk with out given complete admin access. Any Help would be

> > great.

 

Conceptually any ad task (ie. reset, unlock, move user from one OU to

another)

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Jeff <nospam@tampabay.rr.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: Ad help desk delegation

Date: 08/22/2007 16:19:33

 

 

Try looking at this article to get an idea of how to accomplish what you are

looking for.

 

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/technologies/directory/activedirectory/stepbystep/ctrlwiz.mspx

 

 

"Dwonder" wrote in message

news:1187803327.898059.56150@i13g2000prf.googlegroups.com...

> On Aug 22, 11:44 am, Meinolf Weber (Myweb) wrote:

>> Hello Dwonder,

>>

>> Which tasks should they run? Would be easier to help you if we know that.

>>

>> Best regards

>>

>> Meinolf Weber (Myweb)

>> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and

>> confers

>> no rights.

>>

>> > Good morning,

>>

>> > Any one have any ideas on the best practice to delegate control to the

>> > help desk with out given complete admin access. Any Help would be

>> > great.

>

> Conceptually any ad task (ie. reset, unlock, move user from one OU to

> another)

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: KevinMc <kevinmckinnerney@hotmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: ?? Server 2003 R2 Crashes on Setup ??

Date: 09/21/2007 18:53:46

 

 

I saw this error recently on a case I was working on. It turned out to be

bad RAM. You may want to try testing that.

-KevinMc

 

"Tom Baxter" wrote in message

news:5513357C-E07B-4486-803E-D35E78D83ECC@microsoft.com...

> Hi Everyone,

>

> As my title indicates, Server 2003 is crashing with a blue screen during

> installation.

>

> The error I'm getting is:

>

> DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL

> STOP: 0x000000D1 (0x00000000, 0xD0000002, 0x00000000, 0x00000000)

>

> I've Googled this error and it seems to indicate driver problem. But the

> driver is being supplied by Windows itself during installation. I can tell

> you the error happens when the GUI part of the installation is about 60%

> complete. The message along the left edge of the screen (below the

> progress

> bar) says, "Installing Devices".

>

> What's also odd is that I can install XP Pro, Vista and Server 2008 B3 on

> the same machine with no problems. It's only Server 2003 that seems to

> have

> this issue.

>

> The machine is not really a server class machine -- it's an HP Pavilion

> a566n with 2GB -- more of a desktop machine but I thought it should be

> sufficient for me to get started learning Server 2003.

>

> Is there any advice as to how I might proceed?

>

> Thanks very much

> --

> Tom Baxter

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: KevinMc <kevinmckinnerney@hotmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 3 GB  Memeory

Date: 09/21/2007 18:43:17

 

 

See http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328882 for information on this.

-KevinMc

 

"scuba19" wrote in message

news:44F1561A-4A0E-4EA7-96FD-63D549E2B754@microsoft.com...

> I would like to know with server 2003 if have more than 3GB of memory

> can

> i use both the /3GB and the /PAE switch ? Actually can both switches be

> used in the Boot.ini file as I do not see anywhere on the Internet

> where

> both switches can be used.

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] <lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 server replication

Date: 09/07/2007 11:00:17

 

 

Stephen wrote:

> I'm putting together a tight procedure which defines a 'standard' 2003

> server base install. Roles, applications etc can then be added after.

>

> We need to roll out servers based on the standard config, in order to

> maintain a sense of consistancy.

>

> Are there any resources or documents on best practices and tuning for

> setting up a optimal 2003 install?

>

> Seems that inserting the CD is only a very minor part of getting the

> 2003 installed.

>

> Thanks

 

It's rather hard to answer that without knowing what exactly the servers

will be used *for*. You'd probably have a different config for, say, a

domain controller, than a print server.

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Stephen <info@fnc.co.uk>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 server replication

Date: 09/11/2007 09:00:12

 

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

I have in the past rolled out Windows server's ad-hoc.

 

Future servers which will be rebuilds of SQL, IIS and some new DC I would

like to put some build procedures in place.

 

I'm working on collecting together best practises for standard server

installs, (before sysprep'ing or imaging them).

 

Many thanks

 

Stephen

 

 

 

 

"Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"

wrote in message

news:OdZD0gW8HHA.1164@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

> Stephen wrote:

>> I'm putting together a tight procedure which defines a 'standard' 2003

>> server base install. Roles, applications etc can then be added after.

>>

>> We need to roll out servers based on the standard config, in order to

>> maintain a sense of consistancy.

>>

>> Are there any resources or documents on best practices and tuning for

>> setting up a optimal 2003 install?

>>

>> Seems that inserting the CD is only a very minor part of getting the

>> 2003 installed.

>>

>> Thanks

>

> It's rather hard to answer that without knowing what exactly the servers

> will be used *for*. You'd probably have a different config for, say, a

> domain controller, than a print server.

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Lanwench [MVP - Exchange] <lanwench@heybuddy.donotsendme.unsolicitedmailatyahoo.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 server replication

Date: 09/11/2007 19:59:00

 

 

Stephen wrote:

> Thanks for the reply.

>

> I have in the past rolled out Windows server's ad-hoc.

>

> Future servers which will be rebuilds of SQL, IIS and some new DC I

> would like to put some build procedures in place.

>

> I'm working on collecting together best practises for standard server

> installs, (before sysprep'ing or imaging them).

>

> Many thanks

>

> Stephen

 

I think that sounds like a good plan, but surely at this point you have your

standards defined, no? If you have specific questions about "What should

setting X be on a DC with no file/print roles" etc., someone may be able to

help, but it's hard to know how to answer your question as it's a bit vague

for a newsgroup post. There are different "best practices" for different

kinds of servers ?

further. :(

>

>

>

>

> "Lanwench [MVP - Exchange]"

> wrote in

> message news:OdZD0gW8HHA.1164@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

>> Stephen wrote:

>>> I'm putting together a tight procedure which defines a 'standard'

>>> 2003 server base install. Roles, applications etc can then be added

>>> after. We need to roll out servers based on the standard config, in

>>> order

>>> to maintain a sense of consistancy.

>>>

>>> Are there any resources or documents on best practices and tuning

>>> for setting up a optimal 2003 install?

>>>

>>> Seems that inserting the CD is only a very minor part of getting the

>>> 2003 installed.

>>>

>>> Thanks

>>

>> It's rather hard to answer that without knowing what exactly the

>> servers will be used *for*. You'd probably have a different config

>> for, say, a domain controller, than a print server.

 

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: kj [SBS MVP] <KevinJ.SBS@SPAMFREE.gmail.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 SBS Cals

Date: 09/30/2007 02:38:44

 

 

Cory Tse wrote:

> I have a unique situation. I have a client that has a server which

> they changed the Active Directory Admin password and now can't get

> back in. To make a long story short, we purchased a new (different)

> server for them - managed to move as much data from the old server to

> the new server and now I am left with migrating the remaining data

> from the old server to the new server. However, I am having a

> problem with the licensing as they have misplaced their paper CAL for

> their 25 user licenses but I managed to find a back up file of their

> CAL off their original server which I have - SBSCALS.LIC. Is there

> some way to open this file and get the CAL off it? The new server and

> old server has different hardware specs., and thus I can not use the

> Backup/Restore CAL feature in licensing. Even if I can send it to

> Microsoft and have MS extrapolate this information would be greatly

> appreciated. I am at a loss as to where to go from here. I've even

> rebuilt/reinstalled the OS in the old server but now I don't get the

> option to use the Backup/Restore feature in the OS. Thank you for

> your/any assistance.

>

> Regards,

> Cory

 

You might try this;

http://blog.mpecsinc.ca/2007/09/sbs-lost-cal-recovery-or-reset-cal.html

 

Did they buy their licenses under Open licensing? OEM?

 

--

/kj

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Somnath <somnathremovethispart@qssdotco.in>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 SBS Cals

Date: 10/01/2007 04:33:27

 

 

Hi,

 

As far as I know, if it was a volume purchase then you can login to MS site

for the licenses or call to MS to get the licenses.

 

Thank you,

 

Somnath Ukil

"Cory Tse" wrote in message

news:7D071D83-CA8E-4B00-8D43-CDE890F26A9F@microsoft.com...

>I have a unique situation. I have a client that has a server which they

> changed the Active Directory Admin password and now can't get back in. To

> make a long story short, we purchased a new (different) server for them -

> managed to move as much data from the old server to the new server and now

> I

> am left with migrating the remaining data from the old server to the new

> server. However, I am having a problem with the licensing as they have

> misplaced their paper CAL for their 25 user licenses but I managed to find

> a

> back up file of their CAL off their original server which I have -

> SBSCALS.LIC. Is there some way to open this file and get the CAL off it?

> The new server and old server has different hardware specs., and thus I

> can

> not use the Backup/Restore CAL feature in licensing. Even if I can send

> it

> to Microsoft and have MS extrapolate this information would be greatly

> appreciated. I am at a loss as to where to go from here. I've even

> rebuilt/reinstalled the OS in the old server but now I don't get the

> option

> to use the Backup/Restore feature in the OS. Thank you for your/any

> assistance.

>

> Regards,

> Cory

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Cory Tse <CoryTse@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2003 SBS Cals

Date: 10/03/2007 13:31:01

 

 

Thank you everyone for your responses. The CALS were purchased OEM

unfortunately. But I will try your suggested weblink/blog. Thank you again.

 

"Somnath" wrote:

 

> Hi,

>

> As far as I know, if it was a volume purchase then you can login to MS site

> for the licenses or call to MS to get the licenses.

>

> Thank you,

>

> Somnath Ukil

> "Cory Tse" wrote in message

> news:7D071D83-CA8E-4B00-8D43-CDE890F26A9F@microsoft.com...

> >I have a unique situation. I have a client that has a server which they

> > changed the Active Directory Admin password and now can't get back in. To

> > make a long story short, we purchased a new (different) server for them -

> > managed to move as much data from the old server to the new server and now

> > I

> > am left with migrating the remaining data from the old server to the new

> > server. However, I am having a problem with the licensing as they have

> > misplaced their paper CAL for their 25 user licenses but I managed to find

> > a

> > back up file of their CAL off their original server which I have -

> > SBSCALS.LIC. Is there some way to open this file and get the CAL off it?

> > The new server and old server has different hardware specs., and thus I

> > can

> > not use the Backup/Restore CAL feature in licensing. Even if I can send

> > it

> > to Microsoft and have MS extrapolate this information would be greatly

> > appreciated. I am at a loss as to where to go from here. I've even

> > rebuilt/reinstalled the OS in the old server but now I don't get the

> > option

> > to use the Backup/Restore feature in the OS. Thank you for your/any

> > assistance.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Cory

>

>

>

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Curt McNamee <CurtMcNamee@discussions.microsoft.com>

To: none

Subject: RE: 2.7TB RAID Volume can only use 2.1TB

Date: 09/27/2007 13:51:04

 

 

I answered my own question. My one large RAID 5 volume is recognized as a

MBR disk in windows. I need it to be recognized as a GPT disk under windows

so I can utilize more than 2TB. The only issue is that Windows Server 2003

cannot boot from a GPT disk unless I have an Itanium system which I don't, so

I have to split my original RAID volume into two volumes (100GB Boot ?

data). The 100GB volume will be recognized as a regular MBR disk in windows,

however the 2.6TB volume will become a GPT disk and I should be good to go.

 

"Curt McNamee" wrote:

 

> Hi Folks, I admit I am most likely doing something wrong. I have a new

> server with 2.7TB RAID 5 volume (spread among 7 500GB disks), I have a 100GB

> NTFS boot partition and a 2TB NTFS data partition. I have 743GB of

> unallocated space left within the RAID container that is recognized by the

> windows Disk Management utility. If I right click the 743GB of unallocated

> space the create partition option is grayed out. If I delete the 2TB data

> partition I see two sections of unallocated space (2TB ?

> one large section unallocated space.

>

> Could anyone point me to what I am doing wrong here?

> -Curt

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

From: Daveg <dguenthners@yahoo.com>

To: none

Subject: Re: 2.7TB RAID Volume can only use 2.1TB

Date: 09/27/2007 22:09:45

 

 

Curt, you found your answer. I would just add that volumes of that

size may present you with an extended outage if chkdsk runs at some

point. I would consider breaking that large space in into smaller,

more manageable chunks, and use mount points. Say 500 GB etc.

 

Just a thought.

 

daveg

 

 

 

Top


 

 

 

Post your questions, comments, feedbacks and suggestions